Case studies / Workforce
Case study

Workforce productivity & value

Output volume isn't value created. We redefined productivity around the work that actually moves the business, not the hours spent on it.

DomainWorkforce & capacity
FocusValue efficiency · Time · Task mix
Built onPower BI · SQL · Python
EngagementSingle senior partner
Interactive report. Toggle the filters and hover any chart. · Illustrative data, representative of a real engagement.
The challenge

Everyone was busy. No one could say how much of it mattered.

Activity was easy to measure and value was not, so the organisation managed what it could see: hours, tickets, output volume. None of it answered whether the work was creating value.

We mapped time allocation, output, and task structure together, then reframed productivity as value efficiency, the share of effort that actually moves the business.

What if you could see not just how much people work, but how much value their work creates?
What the data revealed

Four findings that reframed the conversation.

01

42% of total working hours went to admin and repetitive tasks that generated almost no business value.

02

High-impact work was concentrated in just 23% of hours, and protecting it mattered more than adding headcount.

03

Quantified roughly 12 reclaimable hours per employee per week through automation, the equivalent of one extra working day.

04

Exposed a near 2× productivity gap between the strongest and weakest teams doing comparable work (92 vs 49).

How we approached it

Four phases. One partnership.

Phase 01
Define

We agreed with leadership what “value” meant for each team — before measuring a single hour.

Phase 02
Map

We brought time allocation, output, and task structure into one model, with definitions everyone could stand behind.

Phase 03
Reframe

We built the view that expressed productivity as value efficiency, surfacing where effort and impact had drifted apart.

Phase 04
Stay

We stayed through the first capacity decisions it informed, refining the model as teams rebalanced their work.

The impact

From measuring activity to measuring value.

~30%
of measured time sat in low-value tasks, now visible and reclaimable
efficiency gap between comparable teams, explained by task structure
1
shared definition of value efficiency replacing competing activity metrics

Measurement shifted from activity volume to value creation, improving capacity planning and unlocking material reclaimable time across teams, without asking anyone to simply work more.

See what your team's time is really worth.

A free 45-minute strategy call. One senior partner, your questions, and an honest read on where value and effort have drifted apart.